Skip to main content

Table 2 Propensity score matching (PSM) outcomes

From: Impact of early CVP monitoring on 1-year mortality in patients with congestive heart failure in the ICU: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV2.2 database

Item1

Item2

OR(95%CI)

P value

Unmatched.crude

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.36 (0.27 ~ 0.47)

< 0.001

Multivariable.adjusted

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.69 (0.48 ~ 0.99)

0.044

PropensityScore.adjusted

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.77 (0.55 ~ 1.06)

0.111

PropensityScore.Matched

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.87 (0.61 ~ 1.25)

0.463

Weighted.IPTW

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

1.02 (0.79 ~ 1.31)

0.877

Weighted.SMRW

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.57 (0.43 ~ 0.75)

< 0.001

Weighted.PA

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.75 (0.53 ~ 1.08)

0.121

Weighted.Ow

CVP early: 1 vs. 0

0.77 (0.5 ~ 1.19)

0.233

  1. The variable“CVP early: 1 vs. 0”indicates the comparison between patients who received early CVP monitoring (within 24 h of ICU admission) and those who did not. The following statistical methods were applied:
  2. Unmatched crude: The raw, unadjusted comparison
  3. Multivariable adjusted: Adjusted for potential confounders
  4. Propensity Score adjusted: Adjusted using propensity score weighting
  5. Propensity Score Matched: Matched on propensity scores
  6. Weighted IPTW (Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting): Weighting based on the inverse probability of treatment
  7. Weighted SMRW (Standardized Mortality Ratio Weighting): Weighting based on the standardized mortality ratio
  8. Weighted PA (Propensity Score Adjustment): Adjustment using propensity score weights
  9. Weighted OW (Overlap Weighting): Weighting using overlap propensity score methodology