Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Fig. 3

From: Comparison of machine learning models with conventional statistical methods for prediction of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fig. 3

(A) Pooled c-statistic of the best performing ML (left) vs. LR/ risk scores (right) models for bleeding. (B) Pooled c-statistic of the best performing ML (left) vs. LR (right) models for AKI. (C) Pooled c-statistic of the best performing ML (left) vs. LR/ Cox proportional hazard (right) models for MACE

Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us