Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of machine learning models with conventional statistical methods for prediction of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Submission
4 Mar 2025 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Mar 2025 Author responded Author comments - Sepehr Nayebirad
3 Apr 2025 Author responded Author comments - Sepehr Nayebirad
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Mar 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
8 Apr 2025 Editorially accepted
23 Apr 2025 Article published 10.1186/s12872-025-04746-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page